LIBE hält EU-US-DPF für nicht "angemessen" genug
von , veröffentlicht am 15.02.2023The European Parliament’s civil liberties committee (LIBE) hat gestern (14.2.23) die Europäische Kommission aufgefordert, den USA keine Entscheidung über die Angemessenheit von Daten zu erteilen.
In acht Punkten wird erläutert, warum der Angemessenheitsbeschluss nicht beschlossen werden kann. Nachstehend einige dieser Punkt:
Nr. 3: „Regrets the fact that the EO does not prohibit the bulk collection of data by signals intelligence, including the content of communications…”
Nr. 5: “ (…) points out that a complainant will be represented by a ‘special advocate’ designated by the DPRC, for whom there is no requirement of independence (…)”
Nr. 6 “(…) the remedies available for commercial matters under the adequacy decision are insufficient (…)”
Nr. 8: “Points out that, unlike all other third countries that have received an adequacy decision under the GDPR, the US still does not have a federal data protection law; points out that the EO is not clear, precise or foreseeable in its application, as it can be amended at any time by the US President;(…)”
Diese Bewertung läßt mE die Intelligence Community Directive 126 - Implementation Procedures for the Signals Intelligence Redress Mechanism under Executive Order 14086 vom 6.12.2022 (ICD 126) sowie das Briefing des Wissenschaftl. Dienst des Europäischen Parlaments vom 14.12.2022 unberücksichtigt.
- The new US framework aims to enhance the level of privacy and data protection for EU data subjects in order to match, in essence, that of the EU and thereby meet EU requirements for data transfers.
- The Schrems II judgment reveals that the difference in treatment is rooted in the EU data acquis and the distribution of powers between the EU and its Member State, rather than in political considerations.
- Section3(f)(i)(A) of the new Executive Order 14086 now also contains a reciprocity provision, which makes EU data subject’s access to the redress mechanism conditional on 'appropriate safeguards in the conduct of signals intelligence activities for [US] persons' personal information that is transferred from the [US]to the territory of the country or a member country of the regional economic integration organization’.
Was meinen Sie?
Hinweise zur bestehenden Moderationspraxis
Kommentar schreiben
1 Kommentar
Kommentare als Feed abonnierenDa hat Magister Schrems ja gute Lobbying-Arbeit geleistet. Egal, was an diesen rechtlich Punkten dran ist: LIBE schwingt sich mit wenigen Sätzen zum Kenner des US-Rechts auf und lässt uns im Dunklen, warum die angeblichen Bedenken so schwerwiegend sind, dass die Angemessenheit durch die KOM (!) zu versagen ist. "Angemessen" bedeutet gerade nicht "gleich." Und der Hamburger DSB klang doch viel positiver, was die EO : https://datenschutz-hamburg.de/pages/executiveorder/